By: John Keitel

My comments are about the political processes and consequences of how candidates decide to handle adversities.

All we heard in the MSM about this press conference to denounce the Rev. Jeremiah Wright was, how courageous, very courageous, brave, most forthright repudiation, public divorce. This was the MSMs attempt at sanitizing this issue and trying to make it go away.

Give me a break are we to believe that the marshmellow interviews and the NAACP comments were fine by Obama, But the National Press Club comments were too much? Obama said that this was a performance. Is Obama asking us to believe that we knew more about his Pastor than he did? What does that say about Obamas judgment?

Obama, What Wright said directly contradicts everything Ive done in my life. How can that be if Wright was is close friend, Obama said he was familiy?

Obama, Wright showed disregard for me and my campaign. This was seen by Obama as personal and is a big reason for Obamas anger. It is all about the Obama and his campaign NOT ABOUT THE COUNTRY THAT WRIGHT ATTACKS!

Obama, Wrights comments were a bunch of rants. Obama believes most of the rants or he would not have stayed around for almost 20 years.

Obama, Yesterday I think he (Wright) characterized himself. Obamas judgment kept him in the pews for almost 20 years and yesterdays comments characterized Wright?

Obama has stood tall for Rev. Wright even in his race speech. Which I said was all about diversion using race and not about the issues that Wright brought up, GD America, 9/11 Americas fault, US of KKKA, etc. The race speech was a diversion to the Rev. Wright issue, it did not work. This Rev. Wright issue has never been about race but about God and Country!

Obama said that his campaign canceled Rev. Wrights apperance for the announcement of his campaign. Yesterday Obama said that Rev. Wright prayed with him and his family inside before going out to announce his candidacy for President. Judgment?

Obama, Where are all the fainters?

By: John Keitel

The network and cable coverage of the Iraq War has all but disappeared. David Bauder, of MiamiHerald.com, writes;
Statistics clearly illustrate the diminished attention. For the first 10 weeks of the year, the war accounted for 3 percent of television, newspaper and Internet stories in the Project for Excellence in Journalisms survey of news coverage. During the same period in 2007, Iraq filled 23 percent of the news hole.

The difference is even more stark on cable news networks: 24 percent of the time spent on Iraq last year, just 1 percent this year.

The big reason for this precipitous drop in news coverage is that improvement and progress is occurring in Iraq. That is against the political mantra of the leftist media. They believe if they say it will fail enough, people will begin to believe in failure. Which is what they want anyway, failure or the belief it will happen. This being a political year failure of Iraq is the only way Iraq will be in the news. Successes in Iraq spells doom for the Democrat party line, get out now the war is lost.

The secret is that a large majority of Americans think the surge is working and that we will win in Iraq. The people are right success is occurring. Political progress is being made. And combat deaths are down below 30 a month. in contrast, 20 years ago yesterday Saddam Husein gased 3,600 Kurds to death in one day with an attempt at genocide.

Brauder also writes; Its possible to pinpoint the exact week that the switch turned off. The war averaged 30 minutes per week of coverage last year on the three network evening newscasts up until Gen. David Petraeus, commander of the U.S. forces, testified in September about the surges progress, according to news consultant Andrew Tyndall. In the last 15 weeks of the year, the broadcasts collectively spent four minutes per week on the war.

Great job Gen. Petraeus, you have taken the fight to the enemy, youve saved lives, youve built lives, and are putting lives back together. And at the same time sent the old media hiding. As long as they stay off of the subject they will do less harm. But could they actually help?

Yes, they could, but that would mean having patriotism, a uniting the likes of WWII. Calm down, this wont happen. Since the 1960s the media has been trained with the intent of instilling the most marxist ideals possible. This is antithetical to Freedom, so the ideals they have learned are for the purpose of destroying our Republic. Not supporting it.

They do not want our country to united they only seek to divide us into categories, labels to place upon us to oppress us. Martin Luther King taught to measure by character. People of character would ban together in a unified spirit to lift this country up. Not wish and work towards its demise.

By: John Keitel

The anti-war organizations recently met at a K street office to discuss why they have failed to end the Iraq war. The groups have been spending millions lobbying for legislation including anything from time lines and deadlines, to ending funding. All with the goal of defeat for the United States. There have been 70+ attempts by Congress to pass legislation along this order and ALL have failed to achieve the votes needed to pass and then sustain a veto. So much for the mandate of the voters, another lie from the democrat party, the voters only wanted change that would bring about victory not retreat and defeat.

The meeting came to consensus that they did not have the votes to end the war. The new message would be no endless war and they felt this would tag the pro-war republicans as wanting a never ending war. This is where Mrs. Clinton came up with the co-sponsered bill between her and Obama that would prevent the Administration from entering into long term military agreements with Iraq.

No endless war, no way, how intelligent.Let me make sure I have this right, when we start a war there is going to be and end, wow.

Just face it the anti-war effort FAILED and the country will be better off.

All four major scientific earth monitors report the earth has cooled 1 degree, clearing 100 years of warming. The earth has been in a 17 year cycle of global warming. This cycle is determined by the suns cycle, not man-made global warming.

Canada's scientist are seeking funds for a better, faster, imaging device that monitors the sun activity. They as well as many scientists around the world are saying that the suns cycle is the reason for earth heating and cooling, not man-made CO2 emissions.

The reasons many scientists are still stuck on man-made global warming is because they get funding for their research from grants, governmental and universities endowments.

The following titles of links to Gov. public Senate Committee records is available at the link section below:

Breakdown Of Key Points Debunking Cilmate Fears

Analysis of how Hollywood Is Promoting Climate Fears to Kids

Analysis of Costly "Solutions" to Global Warming

Over 100 Prominent Scientists Warn UN Against 'Futile' Climate Control Efforts

Skeptical Scientists Urge World To Have the Courage to Do Nothing' At UN Conference

NEW SENATE CAP-AND-TRADE BILL CALLED ALL ECONOMIC PAIN FOR NO CLIMATE GAIN'

Debunking The So-Called 'Consensus' On Global Warming

Scientists Counter AP Article Promoting Computer Model Climate Fears

New Peer-Reviewed Scientific Studies Chill Global Warming Fears

Newsweek's Climate Editorial Screed Violates Basic Standards of Journalism

Newsweek Editor Calls Mag's Global Warming 'Deniers' Article 'Highly Contrived'

Latest Scientific Studies Refute Fears of Greenland Melt

EPA to Probe E-mail Threatening to Destroy' Career of Climate Skeptic

Prominent Scientists Reverse Belief in Man-made Global Warming - Now Skeptics

Senator Inhofe declares climate momentum shifting away from Gore (The Politico op ed)

Scientific Smackdown: Skeptics Voted The Clear Winners Against Global Warming Believers in Heated NYC Debate

Global Warming on Mars & Cosmic Ray Research Are Shattering Media Driven "Consensus'

Global Warming: The Momentum has Shifted to Climate Skeptics

Prominent French Scientist Reverses Belief in Global Warming - Now a Skeptic

Top Israeli Astrophysicist Recants His Belief in Manmade Global Warming - Now Says Sun Biggest Factor in Warming

Warming On Jupiter, Mars, Pluto, Neptune's Moon & Earth Linked to Increased Solar Activity, Scientists Say

Panel of Broadcast Meteorologists Reject Man-Made Global Warming Fears- Claim 95% of Weathermen Skeptical

MIT Climate Scientist Calls Fears of Global Warming 'Silly' - Equates Concerns to Little Kids' Attempting to "Scare Each Other"

Weather Channel TV Host Goes 'Political'- Stars in Global Warming Film Accusing U.S. Government of Criminal Neglect'

Weather Channel Climate Expert Calls for Decertifying Global Warming Skeptics

ABC-TV Meteorologist: I Don't Know A Single Weatherman Who Believes 'Man-Made Global Warming Hype'

By: John Keitel

Full speech and video at: http://digitalartpress.wordpress.com/2008/03/18/&&​ #8203; #8203; obama-its-all-about-race/

What a great speech, isnt he a great speaker, fabulous speech, inspirational, what a great orator, the most important speech since Martin Luther King. WRONG, MLK taught, a dream of a land where men will not argue that the color of a mans skin determines the content of his character.

This speech was a diversion from the problems that Rev. Jeremiah Wright brought to the Obama campaign. The issue is that Rev. Wright was preaching hate and breaking Gods commandments from the pulpit of a church. Obama will pay politically for not disowning the Reverend.

Obamas speech was about how the race problem in America is all about the white mans resentment. It is about white and black, how short sighted. Then Obama ignores the problem that got him into this position.

Beyond blaming the white man for everything, the big problem with this speech is that Obama admitted to being in the pews during some controversial statements. Obama has, until today, said he was not present during any controversial statements by Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Obama said, Did I ever hear him say controversial statements while I sat in the church, Yes.

Obama, Did I know him to be a fierce critic of Americas policies. Yes I am sure you have heard your pastors say similar things. NO, pastor, reverends, men and women of God do not preach hate and use God name in vain from there pulpits.
This will be seen as a lack of judgment because he categorically denied he was in the pews during any controversial statements made by Rev. Wright. And if he did he would have confronted the Reverend about them. Obama heard statements but did not confront them, that is accepting them.

Obama, words that may seem jarring to the untrained ear. No, they are jarring because of the training those of us who have attended church KNOW they are wrong and would not continue to listen to. And would not let our children hear. Those of us that are trained would not continue to attend these sermons. Rev. Wrights sermons were hateful towards American white people and America. Obama did not distance himself from these beliefs because he himself believes the hateful words towards America and the white man.

Obama, "I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe." Obama, trashing your Grandmother for your political gain, shame on you. Why is your Grandmother the one to make you cringe? Rev. Wright is not representative of the black community, the black community is greater than you say they are. You are trying to continue racial overtones, oh yeah your a Democrat.

Again back to the white man and white America being racist and this is why the black man cannot make it. Wake up those of you in so-called black America, your future is yours to own, do not let the resentment of white America hold you down. This country is for EVERYONE whether you want to succeed or not, it is your choice.

This concept is what the Democrat leaders are afraid of, they do not want you to believe you can do anything on you own. Democrat party leaders want to continue the labels that give you victim status, that is how they gain control of your life. And keep America divisive.

America does not need a lecture on the perceived racism and hate in America. The Rev. Wright needs the lecture on how not to act at the pulpit or in an American community. Rev. Wright is the one preaching hate and breaking commandments from his pulpit, the American people did not say these hateful words, he did.

Stop lecturing America and take care of the problems you say are left over from the 50s and 60s. Start by saying these hateful words are not welcome in an America that has traveled so far from them. You, Barack Obama stand up and make change instead of perpetuating the hate against white America. What a slap in the face of a country made up of immigrants of all walks of life that do their part to make their dreams come true. Without blaming someone else for their problems, but by being self reliant.

Everyone is a part of Obama except Rev. wright. Oh. OK.

By: John Keitel

Barack Obama has decided to give a speech tomorrow to discuss the Rev. jeremiah Wright comments and address "the larger Issue of race." Is this man for real, he obviously thinks he can take the basic Christian principle and turn it into race. He is too smart for himself, he is talking himself into a politician.

This Issue is that Christians are taught that the pulpit is a scared place to preach the word of God. The word of God teaches not to use the Lords name in vain. A basic rule from the ten commandments. The Rev. Wright has not only used the Lords name in vain he also preached for the damning of his country. And continued to curse from the pulpit.

Obama's rejection of Rev. Wrights comments came with praises as well. These statements have been blurry in that he does not seem to understand that his race and religion are not being attacked. The methodology of delivery with words considered blasphemy is what has made people repel from him and Rev. Wright. With more than 85% of Americans identifying themselves as Christians there is no reason the Obama camp should be serious about "the larger issue being race."

Instead what will he do to unite us, insult us and tell us we are being racial about this? These are not "just words." Another big mistake by the Obama campaign. Campaigns cannot afford to make the big mistakes, especially not understanding their constituents.

By: John Keitel
UPDATE: March 19, 2008 This is the actual transcript March 16, 2008 from the Chris Mattews Show web site:

"(Announcements)

MATTHEWS: Welcome back.

Michelle, TELL ME SOMETHING I DON'T KNOW.

Ms. COTTLE: All right. I have to say that what I've been disappointed at
has been the ugly successes of some of the racialization of this race we've
been talking about. Just in the last couple weeks or so, a lot more e-mail
and a lot more responses to stuff that I write about--the Obamas, Barack and
Michelle--has been coming in, and it has a kind of crazy racist flavor to it
that, if that's what's going on with this particular group of, you know,
nutters, I think the broader picture is probably also equally bad.

MATTHEWS: I think I hear the same."

Much different than the portrayal written by Samshed Frogs shamless self promotion below;


Smashed Frog thinks its cool that she got the friendly Liberal press agent to call her only commenter writing on her site derogatory terms.

Smashed frog posts:

""Michelle Cottle--Senior Editor of The New Republic--answered Chris Matthews' weekly toss-up--Tell me something I don't know--with an answer most of us already knew.

To paraphrase Cottle--

The racial overtones overshadowing last week's campaign coverage have brought out the nutters in full force.

That would help explain the comments posted here at If I'm President and over at Smashed Frog.

These aren't the typical wackos, but your basic hardcore nutters, espousing fear tactics of race and religion that so scary easy roll off their forked tongues, to spew out civil unrest like a pistachio shell caught between their teeth.

These folks are a hatred Chex Mix of a whole different level of insanity.""

I as DigitalNews replied:

"These folks are a hatred Chex Mix of a whole different level of insanity."

Obviously a great example of "journalism." Only one person writing for the "Folks", "hardcore nutters." I am the only commenter keeping truth alive on this blog site.

As I have written before, say something about the "messianic", medias word not mine, Obama campaign and get called a racist.

Now add "the hate nutters", "fear tactics of race and religion," "forked tongues," and "spew civil unrest."

Civil unrest is what the left lives on.

My "unrest" is the terminology from the pulpit, condoned by Barack Obama in hiring Rev Wright after knowing of his comments.

The Lords name is not to be used in vain at all. But especially close to all religions is the pulpit. Rev. wright used the Lords name in vain and curses from the pulpit. Breaking one of the ten commandments.

This was done in the name of political power. Using the Lords name in vain against your country is not following the teachings of Jesus Christ.

My points have been that these "sermons" would hurt, if not end, Barack Obamas Presidential campaign and maybe his political career. Nothing more. Certainly not hatred.

If this were a Republican candidate he/she would have been made to resign, amid protests from the like of Rev. Al Sharpton. And the coverage would be top billed all this week and into the general until that objective was reached."

Sunny of "Smashed frog writes:

"Ah, you're just mad because the rest of us caught on to the race-baiting right from the start. But you have the right to your own opinion--just like mine, it's far from journalism."

DigitalNews;

I will finish this on my site. No, you still don't get it. But why would a Democrat/Liberal get anything having to do with religion and culture. You have a Reverend that has taken the Lords name in vain against our country. Our country is more than 85% Christian and repels at the usage of the Lords name in vain. It is a commandment of God.

This controversy is about the behavior of Rev. Wright from his pulpit and the decision of the Obama campaign to hire him for their Presidential African American Religious Council. That was a political calculation that has backfired. Now the campaign and it supporters use the race card to try and scare away commentators.

This is not an attack or "race-batting." Instead this is a reaction to the words of Obama's friend, mentor, pastor, and campaign adviser, Rev. Jeremiah Wright that break commandments Christians are told to live by. And the judgment shown by Obama in putting the Rev. Wright on his campaign.

So why is it that Obama dumps the Rezco information out the same weekend of this Rev. Wright controvercy? Another political move to try and hide himself from the American voter.

The "rest of you" did not catch on to the "race batting", instead you try and create it by labeling someone with it. Say it enough and the people will believe it, is the mantra of the OLD MEDIA.

By: John Keitel

The steady drip, drip, drip is now happening. Reuters reports, "WASHINGTON - Presidential candidate Barack Obama said on Friday an indicted Chicago businessman raised up to $250,000 for his previous political campaigns, a higher figure than he previously reported, according to two Chicago newspapers."

We already suspected this and have felt it was covered up. Since the Rezco indictment I have waited for the other shoe to drop. Now we have Obama in a lie and cover-up. He said that he did not have ties to Rezco. Now he tells us that Rezco gave a quarter of a million to his state candidacy, how much to his Presidential run. And then let hear about Louis Farrakhan's contributions, they are neighbors. And Farrakhan is his biggest constituent in his district. You cannot tell me there is not something under the rug. Lets hear the truth about their properties next to each other being purchased together.

Your seeing a candidacy coming apart.

By John Keitel

(Several video clips below)

The old media biased coverage for their candidate, Barack Obama for president, concerning his Spiritual Adviser Rev. Jeremiah Wright of the Trinity United Church of Christ. Which advocates the Black value system as their mission. Also Obamas campaign has named Wright a member to his Presidential African American Religious Leadership Council.

The old media is saying biased things like; You cant hold Obama responsible for Wrights statements, fiery speeches, fiery friend, fiery fallout. CNNs Anderson Cooper, Harsh as it sounds, like it or not, its the truth, "It's off track," Hes like a old uncle you dont agree with. And ABC saying Wright is a powerful voice and strong words, and He often uses the Bible to support his political views.

Are you serious Mr. Barack Obama? Jeremiah Wright baptized your children. You chose to go to this church, for 20 years. You gave $22,500 to this church recently, how much over your life time membership? Do you let your children listen to this hate? Should anyone take you children to hear these hateful racist speech?

Where is the change, the hope, the unity, a new future?

What about Christians being smeared in the media over the years by association with Pastor Robertson or Rev. Jerry Falwell?(The statements were wrong headed and they were chastised by Christians for them) Or just being a Christian? Or believing that killing an unborn child is wrong?

If this were a Republican the media would hold it until a day before the election.

McCain is being asked by the old media to drop one of his spiritual advisers for saying that we should fight to rid the world of radical Islam. Hypocrites!

Local station of KVOR reports, Barack Obama is trying to distance himself from the Reverend. And then they only play Wrights comment about no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Because that fits the media template. And nothing in the national top of the hour radio news.

Now for the hate speeches, NOT SERMONS, from the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, Barack Obamas pastor for 20 years and now his campaigns Spiritual Adviser and member of his African American Religious Leadership Council. Be aware these are hateful, graphic comments.

Don't tell me words don't matter!

videos

By: John Keitel

If you do not see the democrat/liberally biased media now, lets compare coverage. The media since Monday has covered the allegations of New York Governor Democrat Elliot Spitzer being deeply involved in a international prostitution ring with mournful statements.

We have heard from most members of the media with very similar statements. Statements such as, "what a tragedy," what a personal tragedy," "a fall from grace," "stunning," "should he really resign?" " can he stay in office," "can he weather this?" "he had a tryst," "sexual services," "a liaison," "he saw a call girl," "a sex scandal," "only Republicans are calling for his resignation," "New Yorker usually don't care about sex," "this was only found through wiretap law enacted after 9/11," "linked to a prostitution scandal," "the Man Act is over 100 years old," "not a normal kind of prosecution," "its the power syndrome," "its a disease that needs treatment," "how did this occur with money moving from a private account?" "what about the Republicans that were able to stay in office?" "even his wife wanted him to remain as Governor," "this is a sad day," this is a very sad day," "his departure," "should a public official be held to a higher standard?" "we need to put this behind us," "this is a selective prosecution," "he has been targeted," and "he will be savaged," "its time for us to move on," "this is one less super delegate for Hillary Clinton."

Are they serious? This Governor is the chief justice official of the state of New York. His is implicated with involvement in a international prostitution ring, money laundering, the man act (bringing a prostitute across state lines), and misuse of state funds. Spitzer made his name prosecuting prostitution rings in New York.

If Spitzer was a Republican he would here phrases like, what a hypocrite, he should have already resigned, what is the rest of the story? this is a violation of his duties as a public servant, did he provide favors from the ring leaders? is he part of the under world? does he have ties to the mob? how big of a part does he play in the ring, is he a partner in the ring, we need a complete investigation, he has broken federal laws, he has broken state and federal laws, he will do time, he will do state and federal time, what other Republicans are involved? there is more here than we know, this will effect the Republicans in the next election, and this again shows how corrupt the Republican party is.

You get the idea, the media is a bunch of democrat, liberally biased hypocrites. The only concern they have is to keep democrats in power.